Case 304: A clear reflection beside the empty display shows a black notebook. Who wore that item?
Hamza
Rana
Salma
Leena
Crime & Detective · Medium
Case Crackers: The Chess Final Scorecard Mystery 304
A complete ten-question detective case set at a history gallery, centered on the missing chess final scorecard. Includes observation, timelines, code-breaking, deduction, evidence practice, True/False, and Yes/No decisions.
Case 304: The display sensor changed at 10:00, matching one arrival record. Whose record matches?
Leena at 10:00
Hamza at 9:30
Rana at 9:45
Salma at 10:15
Case 304: The mystery code advances each letter by 1. What does the coded clue DPEF mean?
CHAIR
CODE
LAMP
NOTE
Case 304: Reading the entry list from earliest to latest gives Hamza → Rana → Leena → Salma. Which name is second?
Hamza
Leena
Rana
Salma
Case 304: Verified photos place Hamza at the main staircase, Rana at the west balcony, and Salma at the display hall. Whose location still needs checking?
Hamza
Rana
Salma
Leena
Case 304: Two accounts disagree about when the chess final scorecard disappeared. Which action would best test them?
Compare both accounts with timestamps
Choose the more exciting story
Ignore both accounts
Ask them to copy each other
Case 304: The entry records show Hamza arrived before Salma.
False
True
Case 304: Seeing a black notebook proves the wearer took the chess final scorecard, so no other evidence is needed.
False
True
Case 304: Should the team photograph the history gallery display before moving nearby objects?
No
Yes
Case 304: Should investigators compare the coded word, the 10:00 log, and witness details before deciding what happened to the chess final scorecard?
Yes
No